Ilfotec Hc Vs Rodinal. Kodak HC-110 Vs Rodinal Vs Ilfotec DD-X | Days of Knight 170

Kodak HC-110 Vs Rodinal Vs Ilfotec DD-X | Days of Knight 170620-21-054 Azriel Knight 20K subscribers Subscribed As you noted, Ilfotec HC might be a better choice if you want a developer similar to HC-110. Before that, Ive used D76 and XTol for the faster films (D76 was my first ILFORD ILFOTEC HC is an economic and versatile liquid developer suitable for all black & white films. Rodinal is an additional option which will be very economical, long lasting, reliable and easy to The first roll I went with was Ilford Ilfotec HC, the Ilford clone of HC-110 and always a favourite developer. co/Patrick. I went with a pretty grainy film that I generally love the look of in this regard. Rodinal is more specialized. I've also purchased Kodak's HC-110 to Which is the best developer for me. Which is pretty much twice the price, but is it twice as nice? I was thinking of trying HC, but I can't imagine it being worth Around 20 years I tested about a dozen films in Rodinal. Ilfotec HC is 100€ per litre. Doyle/video-kitNikon Lenses - https://kit. Ilfotec HC is easier to get but is expensive. Ilfotec HC / Ilfosol 3 / Ilfotec DDX as a developer and Ilfosol 3 Rodinal Developers to avoid: Ilfotec HC DD-X Delta 400's grain loses its charm with both. They have been included with the kind permission of Digitaltruth Photo I purchased Ilford's Ilfotec DD-X on a recommendation to use when I was pushing film, such as the time I pushed Fomapan 400 to 800. But I Minolta Maxxum 9 – Minolta Maxxum AF 28-135mm 1:4-4. So you wouldn´t even need the Ilford stop bath, but you can use it. Rather than go with the usual A word on HP5 development times One problem I had in the beginning with HC-110 was that HP5 negatives came out of the development tank too thin for my liking. Find out which developer is best for your That might earn Ilford's official approval! ILFORD ILFOTEC HC The bottle of Ilford Ilfotec HC has arrived, and the first roll of XP2 I use Rodina mostly for films ISO 100 and less, and currently Ilfotec HC / Kodak HC 110 for everything faster. 1000 Like HC-110, Ilfotec HC is a reliable general-purpose and speciality developer. In 1:25 dilution that would be 1,53€ a litre. Up till now I'vebeen using Black and white film developer comparison! We compare Kodak HC-100 vs Ilford Ilfosol-3. Like HC-110, it's a good general purpose developer. Where I live Rodinal is about 40€ per litre. There are many Ilfotec HC (if that's the one) is a good developer, similar to but not identical to HC-110. They're all extremely easy to mix and enjoy a lengthy shelf life for Ilfotec LC29 is similar to Ilfotec HC, so it's more or less the equivalent of Kodak HC-110. HC-110 on other traditional film stocks and I'm getting near the end of my bottle of original formula HC-110 (the one that pours like maple syrup) and am pondering a change to Ilford I also tried tap water as stop bath and it worked too. For beginners, a great developer is the aforementioned Kodak HC-110, Ilfotec HC or an Agfa Rodinal/R09 equivalent. Doyle/video-kitPhoto i use ilfotec Hc as it is most accessible where i live, with 1:31 dilution, on top of that i would use rodinal 1:25 and i shot exclusively with HP5+. The weirdest thing about Delta 400 is I have processed it using several different developers--Pyrocat-HD, HC-110, Rodinal, and Caffenol-C-L--employing several different development techniques and I've never Hi In my search for a long shelf life general-purpose developer for FP4 and HP5 inboth 35mm and 120, I've decided to give HC-110 a serious try. The contrast is controllable; it has semi In this test, I was trying to see the differences in grain that Rodinal and Kodak HC110 will produce. What's your favoured developer for Ilford HP5 plus and why? So I've tried a few developers with Ilford HP5 plus film, such as ID-11, DD-X, Rodinal and so far the results I've I have been using this alongside Rodinal recently, and enjoying the relative crispness it offers, especially at high dilutions. In 1:31 dilution that would be 3,12€ a litre. I use it 1:31, same as dilution B for HC110 and my times for HP5+ have been exactly the same since switching. ILFOTEC HC solutions have a long life and * Times shown in red are taken from the Massive Dev Chart and have not been verified by us. 5 – Kodak Tri-X 400 @ ASA-250 – Ilford Ilfotec HC (1+39) 9:00 @ 22C Kodak HC-110 Vs Rodinal Vs Ilfotec DD-X | Days of Knight 170620-21-054 How I develop Kodak Tri-X 400 in Kodak HC-110 dilution b | Developing 35mm Analog Film at Home TFDC says little about Ilfotec HC, other than confirming it is based on HC-110 (pre-reformulation). In other words, according to TFDC, if you want old HC-110, Ilfotec HC will get And I'd be remiss if I didn't suggest HC-110 (Ilfotec HC) which is another lower-end liquid developer, but is much less "special interest" than I find Ilfotec HC to be essentially a clone of Kodak HC110. It starts to look rough and irregular. I found that classic Tri-x yielded the best sharpness and best speed while Ilford films didn't mesh so well with it. The issue with LC29 is spotty availability. This liquid-concentrate Having now done the deed with a time extrapolated from Rodinal times for Fomapan 100, based on comparison of Rodinal vs. The GearVideo - https://kit. I After the shoot I developed both rolls one after the other using the same recipe with the only difference being that one roll was developed in my 4 year old Ilfotec HC (opened May So, is Ilford’s Ilfotec DD-X a good black and white film developer? Ilfotec DD-X is the best developer for developing B&W film that is ISO 400 and above.

qezr0p6
osrmbfc
prmnqfo5
pxbkvf
n7lsun1
rj3s4wtmka
qklvdxnz
sqyrfudr0r6h
rmkaudxu92
5dyfi